We’ve Misunderstood Human Nature for 100 Years
It’s a source of today’s intense political animosity.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/22/opinion/human-nature-polarization-predator.html?smid=em-share
Advice for job Employers and Applicants
We’ve Misunderstood Human Nature for 100 Years
It’s a source of today’s intense political animosity.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/22/opinion/human-nature-polarization-predator.html?smid=em-share
How the Democrats Lost the Working Class
The theory seemed sound: Stabilize financial markets, support the poor and promote a more secure, integrated world. But blue-collar workers were left behind.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/04/us/politics/democrats-working-class.html?smid=em-share
“History should always be told in full,” writes @davidfrum. “But we don’t correct past wrongs committed in a liberal democracy by defaming the ideal itself”:
Artificial intelligence will further concentrate power among a small elite if we don’t take steps to stop it, @harari_yuval writes:
In the 20th century, the masses revolted against exploitation and sought to translate their vital role in the economy into political power. Now the masses fear irrelevance, and they are frantic to use their remaining political power before it is too late. Brexit and the rise of Donald Trump may therefore demonstrate a trajectory opposite to that of traditional socialist revolutions. The Russian, Chinese, and Cuban revolutions were made by people who were vital to the economy but lacked political power; in 2016, Trump and Brexit were supported by many people who still enjoyed political power but feared they were losing their economic worth. Perhaps in the 21st century, populist revolts will be staged not against an economic elite that exploits people but against an economic elite that does not need them anymore. This may well be a losing battle. It is much harder to struggle against irrelevance than against exploitation.
Artificial intelligence will further concentrate power among a small elite if we don’t take steps to stop it, @harari_yuval writes:
Ultrarich tech elites are becoming much more prominent in American politics—and they don’t care who knows it, @alibreland writes.
The energy is different now. “There’s a real shift in ruling-class vibes,” Rob Larson, an economics professor who has written about the new ultrarich and Silicon Valley’s influence on politics, told me. Many of America’s plutocrats seem not to care if people know that they’re trying to manipulate the political system and the Fourth Estate in service of their own interests. Billionaires such as Andreessen and Ackman are openly broadcasting their political desires and “definitely feeling their animal spirits,” Larson said. Or, as the Northwestern University political-science professor Jeffrey Winters put it in a postelection interview with Slate, this feels like a moment of “in-your-face oligarchy.”
Regardless of its provenance, the practical impact of this behavior is a less equal system. Many people are worried about President-Elect Donald Trump’s forthcoming administration’s corrosive effects on democracy. The corrosion is already happening, though. A particularly vocal subset of the ultrarich is steering the ship, and doesn’t care who knows.
Recently, Donald Trump has sat down with podcasters including Lex Fridman, Logan Paul, and Theo Von.
“The podcasters get views, status, and revenue, and Trump gets access to their audience, which is dominated by young men,” @helenlewis writes.
“The Democratic Party, for decades the progressive bastion of the United States, is emerging today as the party of the status quo,” @GrahamDavidA writes: